The other day I sketched out some notes on how friend/follow and subscribe might work in a distributed social network such as Idno (I have since hacked together some plugins based on those notes).

So, I thought I’d sketch up some thoughts on how private and friend only posts might work in a distributed social network:

Outline specification

  • On account creation (or if there isn’t a key present) a key pair is generated, this key pair is used to identify a user’s profile to that user’s friends.
    • I’m not sure exactly what kind of key this should be at this point, although I’m leaning towards a PGP key pair, although OpenSSL has its merits (of course, there is no reason why we can’t use multiple technologies).
    • We’ll probably have to have the private key stored on the server for the purposes of signing, although there’s no reason why these have to be your main keys.
  • When Alice follows Bob, as described in my previous post, they both pull the public keys from each other’s profile as part of that exchange, which have been marked up using Microformats 2. Any keys found are saved against the record of that user.
    • For security, we probably want to do some sort of key validation here; perhaps key fingerprint, or perhaps better some web of trust based on mutual friends…
    • How key revocation might work is an open question, but I think the easiest way might be for Alice to send another subscription request to Bob, and have that re-trigger this process, rather than (as happens at the moment), returning an error that Alice is already subscribed to Bob.
  • When Bob writes a friends only post he lists Alice’s profile UUID in a list of people who can view the post, then ping’s Alice’s endpoint.
  • When Alice visits Bob, or Alice’s site visits Bob’s permalink, it identifies itself by signing the request using her key. If the signature is valid and belongs to a key for a user for which Bob has allowed access to the permalink, the data is displayed, otherwise a HTTP 403 code is returned.

Just some rough thoughts for now, let me know your thoughts!

3 thoughts on “Thoughts: Private posts in a distributed social network

  1. Distributed social networks – tools that give you all the social and political benefits of the siloed networks (Google+, Facebook, etc), but without being a massive honey pot for surveillance and data mining, are, in my view, the way we should be heading.
    In this model, public posts are easy (that’s just the web), but limiting posts so that they can only be seen by a limited number of your friends is somewhat harder. On Elgg, and similar systems, the standard solution was to make everyone create an account, and profile, on your node. This is, to a large extent, the traditional approach, but basically ends up with you having multiple profiles around the internet (with multiple passwords to remember) which are, crucially, controlled by a third party.
    This is a bad thing, and in the post Snowden world, a downright dangerous thing.
    I’ve previously discussed a possible approach to providing distributed signon using OpenPGP keys as identity mechanism, and I’ve finally got around to fleshing this out, and building a prototype, now that distributed friending is in Idno/Known core.
    Protocol overview
    Two user profiles, Alice and Bob
    Alice and Bob generate, or otherwise associate, a PGP key pair with their users (for the most part, only public keys are used in this. You only need to store the private key on the server if you’re automating the process of signing in, and if you can store your private key in your browser, there is eventually no need to store private keys on the server).
    Alice adds Bob as a friend, and Alice’s site visits Bob’s profile for his public key (see “Public key discovery” below)
    Rinse, repeat, for Clare, Dave, Emma, Fred, etc…
    Alice writes a post, and only wants Bob to see it. She lists Bob’s profile URL as an approved viewer.
    Bob visits the private post, and identifies himself by signing his profile URL with his key, and then POSTing the ascii armoured signature as signature to the post URL.
    Alice verifies the signature, and confirms that the key’s fingerprint belongs to Bob’s key, and if so, lets Bob see the post.
    Public key discovery
    Bob makes his public key available by putting it on his web server, and making it easily discoverable to Alice in one or more of the following ways:
    Via a HTTP Link header, with a rel of “key”, e.g. Link:; rel="key"
    Via a META tag in the HTTP header, e.g. <meta href="" />
    Via an anchor tag within the page body of rel=”key”, e.g. <a href="" rel="key">My Key</a>
    By pasting the key into the body of the page, and giving it a class of “key”, e.g.

    <pre class="key">

    Identifying Bob
    When Bob wants to see the post that Alice has made, he identifies himself by making a POST request to that page, containing a signed URL of his profile. Alice then verifies the profile URL against those she as allowed access, and verifies that the signature is both correct and that the fingerprint belongs to Bob’s key.
    Alice may want to store these access details in a session so she can give Bob access to other resources (logging Bob in, in effect), but this is not strictly necessary.
    Other methods are available…
    So, why not use OAuth, or signed HTTP requests?
    Well first of all, all these authentication methods are not mutually exclusive, so there’s no reason why you can’t use multiple techniques.
    Second, we’re using very standard tools (GPG, POST requests, etc), and standard formats, bolted together. Meaning, among other things, although this example (and the Idno implementation) uses a website to do the signing in, this isn’t really required. You can sign in and see a private post, just as easily, using curl and gpg from the command line, if you so require.
    Finally, this is entirely distributed, and unlike some implementations of Oauth, or even things like IndieAuth, it requires no central authority to vouch for you. Update:Aaron points out that the latest versions of Indieauth don’t require a central authority.
    Idno reference implementation
    I have written a plugin that implements this protocol for Idno. In addition to the basic spec, the Idno plugin has the following enhancements, which you may want to consider as well.
    Firstly, it uses OpenPGP.js to generate the keypair on the client machine. This preserves server entropy, making it better for hosted environments.
    Secondly, the plugin provides you with a bookmarklet, which makes signing in to a compatible site nothing more than a button click.
    Please kick both the Idno implementation and the overall spec about, and let me know what you think!
    » Visit the project on Github…

    Thanks for visiting! If you’re new here you might like to read a bit about me. You may also like to follow me on Twitter!

    (Psst… I am also available to hire! Find out more…)
    Share this:EmailLinkedInTwitterGoogleFacebookReddit

Leave a Reply